What is Intuition?

Intuition is a knowing, a sensing which is beyond the conscious understanding. It's the ability to sense or know immediately, without reasoning. Also known as 'a gut feeling' and sometimes intuition is even regarded as a divine or prophetic power.

What is the difference between genuine intuition and 'just a feeling' or 'just a hunch'?
When your logical thoughts are in conflict with your emotions, your emotions will most often win. However, your emotions are not intuition. The heart has reasons the mind could never understand, yes, but warning, even the voice of your heart is not intuition! Intuition is utterly beyond both reason (thoughts) and heart (emotions). Of course there can be intuitive emotional impressions, but when coming from 'the source' they are usually pretty quiet, gentle, fine.

The gentle and genuine voice of your intuition is the exact opposite of plain emotions like: "I feel pretty good about it, let's do it." These 'loud emotions' usually sound very convincing - but more often than not lead to complete disasters when blindly following them! Genuine intuition is a quiet and gentle, even humble, voice within you, which simply tells you what's really going on.

What if you're in doubt? How do you know whether it's really your intuition speaking to you?
How can you be sure that is not just another thought, some wishful thinking or some emotion triggered from your past experiences? How can you know that this is the voice within that you should trust? As already mentioned: Your intuition is quiet, a gentle voice, sometimes only whispering. You might see some images, faint pictures in your mind, hear soft voices. Sometimes you really need to pay very close attention to avoid overhearing the real deal. It might also need courage to listen to your subtle intuitive voice, rather than give in to your restless thoughts or screaming emotions of your feverish mind!

If still in doubt, ask your intuition...
How's that for a paradox? But it's really just that: When you finally manage to overhear the noise of your thoughts and emotions, you will automatically - intuitively - know what's true and what not!

What if your intution confronts you with strange and irrational stuff?
Often the impressions and pictures your intuition comes up with, don't make a lot of 'rational' sense. Immediately your mind will jump in and try to convince you that this can't possibly be true, "it just doesn't make sense" ...yet it stubbornly turns out to be the actual truth.

Your intuitive knowledge may also trigger fear. Don't give in to it. If your emotions are in conflict with your intuitive sensing, you must literally apply discipline: However overwhelming the fear, say thanks to your emotions - and follow your intuition!

If you're brave enough to follow your inner intuitive voice, you will be rewarded by direct and immediate knowledge, as Robert Graves put it:

Intuition is the supra-logic that cuts out all the routine processes of thought and leaps straight from the problem to the answer.

(Robert Graves)

Alexis Carrel even claims that all great people rely basically on their intuition only:

All great men are gifted with intuition. They know without reasoning or analysis, what they need to know.

(Alexis Carrel)

And beware if you're married:

Intuition is what tells a wife her husband has done wrong, before he even thinks of doing it...

So what does your intuition tell you today?

Now on to some ultrafeel stories:
First some classics:

• Not only the economy is down in America. The blowjob rate is at an all-time low too!
• This makes it not easier for nice guys: Why they don't have sex!
• And this superb video about who you really are - it also shows you where your intuition actually comes from.
• Unfortunately too good to be true: Cannabis legalized in New York...
• Demons in Paris? Check out this gargoyles.
• Did you know, UFO's sometimes abduct cows...!
• Enjoy this amazing visual ecstasy with this graphic demo.
• Afraid of sharks? After seeing this (though faked photos) you will fear them even more...
• AC/DC felt safe in New York city on September 11th - they composed the song "Safe in New York city" in 2000...
• Hat Sarah Palin John McCain mit einem blowjob beglückt?
• And only for your pleasure: This super-hot fetish burlesque dance!
• Better be a rebel or a revolutionary?
• Like the color yellow?
• And because you're all brave longterm ultrafeel-fans, this won't shock you...: Sex with sheep...and with bears!

That's it again for this month. And as always, keep sending your fun-da-mental emotions for an ever more monu-mental experience here on this channel.

Pura Vida!
(c)reated by h.r.fox @ ultrafeel.tv

See similar stories on ultrafeel or None

1 comment. What do you feel?

Enjoy an absolutely stunning interview with Bradford Keeney on sex, god and the old shamanic ecstasy techniques. "If we really want the world's spiritual leaders to help us out, then we need to see the Pope and the Dalai Lama agree to change costumes for one week, because if we can't see that degree of play and absurdity then they have nothing to say..." "Move over meditation and welcome heightened arousal and ecstasy." "The original forms of healing and being in relationship to the great mystery was wild, and the last great taboo for us today is opening the door and inviting the wild, that which is uncontrollable, unpredictable..." "It's not about going into trance, it's about being awakened." "...we were born to fully be embraced by bliss." "What we need is to laugh our asses off." "The world is made of stories, not atoms." (In this context see also: 'Reality Is Made Of Language'.) This interview is spectacularly spiritual but powerfully down-to-earth at the same time. Bradford Keeney is charismatic, enthusiastic and totally inspiring. No doubt: The source speaks directly through him!  Enjoy it right here, right now: Bradford Keeney talks with Joanna Harcourt-Smith on Sex, God and shamanic ecstasy shaking. (Interviewed by Joanna Harcourt-Smith on Futureprimitive.org)

(Pic: Elena Dolgova @ Albicocca.ru)

There is no sex-free god...!

(Bradford Keeny)

Bradford Keeney, Ph.D., born 1951, is an American psychotherapist, internationally renowned scholar, cybernetician, ethnographer, therapist, and shaman. He wrote more than thirty books in the fields of psychotherapy, cybernetics, and ethnographies of healing traditions, many of his works are considered classics in their fields. Keeney is cited as one of the major sources on cybernetics in the Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence.

He is also recognized as a spiritual teacher and as an elder shaman in cultures throughout the world including the Guarani Indians of lower basin Amazonia, the Japanese tradition of seiki jutsu, the elder Shakers of St. Vincent, the Zulu sangoma community, diverse folk healers of Brazil, and the Balians of Bali and others. Regarded as a n/om kxao (owner of spiritual power) by the Bushmen of Namibia and Botswana, he founded Thara Tjua (Shaking House), the Bushman Healing Conservancy.

Keeney is the author of 'Profiles of Healing', an encyclopedia of the world’s healing practices as well as several classics in the field of psychotherapy and numerous titles for the popular press, such as:

- Bushman Shaman: Awakening the Spirit through Ecstatic Dance (Autobiography)
- Shamanic Christianity: The Direct Experience of Mystical Communion
- Shaking Medicine: The Healing Power of Ecstatic Movement

In his early work, Keeney articulated patterns of communication for distinguished psychotherapists, later using his own psychotherapeutic cases to show how one can use psychotherapy as an art to create successful therapeutic transformation in clients. Keeney founded the Institute for Creative Transformation in 2009. He is the father of notable Los Angeles based DJ Skee.

Keeney invites us in a most charismatic way to go beyond modernity to the oldest culture on earth to find true magic and power.

Find out more about this fascinating gentleman on his site: Mojodoctors.com

3 comments. What do you feel?

Can life really come out of dead atoms as science claims?

...What does science say about 'world stuff'?

Science says that there is a real world composed of matter/energy and that: "each person is a separate collection of this stuff".

As to the nature of this 'stuff', science agrees that at base (the quantum level), there is no 'substance' - just "relations between quantum events", which are most usually described in the form of mathematical equations - not 'things'.

However, it is said that at larger scales, these 'events' resolve into the 'things' that we perceive: 'hard things' made of 'ordinary matter'.

Science attests that: in and of itself, this 'matter stuff' is "unfeeling and unknowing" (plain dead). Yet, according to science, some of this stuff becomes aware when it is aggregated as 'brains'.

In other words, awareness is postulated to arise out of non-awareness: life out of death... a miracle indeed!

It is supposed to work like this:

External stimuli from the real world (eg 'photons/electro-magnetic radiation' (ie. light), or 'odour molecules', etc) impact on special parts of the body (eg, eyes or nose) creating electro-chemical impulses that travel along the nerves to specific parts of the brain. It is said that the resulting activitiy in the brain gives rise to sensations: colours (seeing), sounds (hearing), flavours (tasting), odours (smelling) and feelings (feeling) inside the brain.

These sensations are meaningless in themselves.

Meaning (knowing) is apparent only when ideas are combined with the sensations to give the impression of a 'felt reality' - inside the brain.

Science has no idea how atoms in a brain create and perceive 'colour', or any other sensation. And, no wonder!

No one has ever seen, or can ever see, 'colours' (or any other sensation) manifesting in a brain in order for any hypothesis to be tested!

All that has ever been observed are apparent traces on apparent instruments that measure postulated electro-chemical impulses in apparent brains!!!!

I said 'apparent' traces and 'apparent' instruments and 'apparent' brains simply because whatever is seen (according to science) is inside the brain.

In this 'perceived world', all 'things'are apparent (without 'substance'). Just like the 'dream world' that seems 'solid' while dreaming - but is not. Of course, when dreaming, you are not 'in the dream' - the dream is 'in you'.

And this too is what science asserts: the whole perceptual world is an illusion inside the head.

In so far as science is concerned, the only difference between the 'perceived world' and the 'dream world', is that the 'perceived images' represent a 'copy' of the 'outside world' and are caused by stimuli from that world. On the other hand, 'dream images' are postulated to arise solely from activity in the brain itself.

But ask yourself, how could 'dead' atoms (that know nothing of who or what or when or where they are) in some supposed 'outside world' interact with dead atoms in a supposed body and brain so as to convey to those dead atoms what the 'outside world' looked, smelled, tasted, sounded and felt like?

How could dead atoms in a brain (that can never get outside the head to see or feel anything in the supposed 'real world') create these impressions for themselves - if all that exists inside a brain is dead atoms?

How could dead atoms give rise to LIFE: laughter, sorrow, music, friends and enemies - the whole wonderful panorama that is this experience?

Science itself asserts that nothing of the supposed real world can ever be seen or known directly by any one.

According to science, the supposed 'real world' is ever beyond the reach of the senses. It cannot be seen or heard or tasted or smelled or felt directly.

Look around. Science says that everything seen and felt is inside your head. Can you locate the head that science says exists? Sorry, it cannot be done.

You may say, I can see it in the mirror. No. If you see it, science says the image is inside the head. If it is inside, it cannot be your head.

Or, what about the feeling of your head in your hands. No again.
Any feeling is inside the brain - according to science. However you may try, you cannot get outside yourself to see who you really are.

This truth is true forever. It is not scientific truth, it is the nature of being.
 

Michael is a CEO of an Australian company in Melbourne which is engaged in moving freight more efficiently, with less impact on the environment. He corresponds with people by email whenever they feel inclined to ask a question about more spiritual matters. He himself enjoys seeing what arises in response... More of Michael's wonderful essays over at Awakeningtothedream.com's forum. Photos: 'Portrait of a molecule' by Richard Skura. 'Head-brain bust' by Clara Natoli.

What do you feel about this?

How to make the right decisions?

Every day, we are forced to make decisions.
Some are simple, like whether or not to add milk to our coffee, what to wear to work, what plans do make for the evening, etc. However, the stakes rise when we're considering bigger decisions like, which investments to proceed with, whom to marry or which battles to fight. Sometimes decisions are clear and other times, they require a lot of time for us to consider our options, to think about the outcomes and weigh whether or not we can live with the consequences.

While our decisions are personal and take our own time to sort out, however, for me, I find that my decisions not only affect me but may also have an impact on my clients. Without exaggerating, I can say that I take more time making decisions for others than for myself. After all, it is part of my job, to help give information to help people make decisions but also give them the latitude to make their own decisions.

Often times, clients ask me to make decisions for them. But my job is really to analyze future possibilities. It’s like using a GPS in a car. The GPS shows you which direction to take but in the end, it’s the driver’s decision if he wants to drive straight through or stop for a rest; if he wants to take major roads or drive through smaller towns at a slower pace. I give the options but the client has to make the final decision.

In my book HELLSICHTIG, I outline several meditations to open people's intuition; one of the techniques helps to make the right “YES or NO” decision. I call this meditation “The Inner Oracle.”

Choose two colors, one to represent 'yes' and the other to represent 'no.' Next choose a “yes or no” decision you have to make. Sit down and relax. Close your eyes and do a meditation to calm down your mind. Bring your brain in a neutral and quiet state. Now connect to your intuition by connecting to the inner silence. Once you feel completely calm, you visualize a big white wall in front of your inner eyes. Repeat the question two or three times in your mind, without speaking it out loud.

When done with this focus on the white wall and ask your intuitive self if the answer is YES or NO. Don't question what appears before you and if no color appears, relax and try it again. If you have the answer, you can stop the meditation and open your eyes.

Later, see if your answer was right or not. If it did not work out the first time, don’t worry and don’t give up. In my seminars more than 80% of the people succeed with this exercise but it takes time and patience. This meditation should help you to trust in your intuition because you see that it works and over time, it'll be easier for you to make the decision that is right for you.

Enjoy the meditation and good luck!

Martin Zoller is an intuitive consultant and gives psychic advice regarding relationships, business, legal affairs, politics and destiny affairs. He also offers meditation and coaching courses as well as workshops to improve and develop intuition and the human potential. These courses are designed specifically either for individuals or companies and institutions. Martin currently lives in Basel, Switzerland. More about Martin Zoller can be found at his site: Martinzoller.eu (Photo: Yes or No)

1 comment. What do you feel?

Der Schweizer hellseher Martin Zoller stellt sein neues projekt Visionary Force vor.

Martin, du bist medium und intuitiver berater. Nun hast du ein neues projekt mitbegründet - die 'Visionary Force'. Wann hast du die VF gegründet und um was geht es dabei?
Vor etwa zwei Jahren habe ich H. Fuchs kennengelernt. Er hat mich nach einem Interview in dem ich über mögliche Smaragdsuche im Dschungel erzählte kontaktiert.
In diesem Interview sprach ich darüber wie ich an einem Projekt arbeite um medial, oder mit Remote Viewing, Edelsteine zu finden. Seitdem haben wir fast an die 100 Remote Viewing Experimente durchgeführt.

Um was für experimente handelte es sich dabei?
Wir haben in allen möglichen Bereichen experimentiert. Zum Beispiel haben wir Edelsteine oder Edelmetalle in der Erde aufgespürt. Das ging so, dass H. Fuchs die Steine oder das Gold versteckte und ich musste es finden. Das Resultat war ausgezeichnet! Wir kamen auf eine durchschnittliche Trefferquote von 80%.

Ebenfalls analysierten wir mit RV Dokumente, Pläne oder Fotos - auch hier mit erstaunlichen Resultaten. Schon vor der Gründung von Visionary Force habe ich viel und erfolgreich mit RV gearbeitet. Durch die Zusammenarbeit mit H. Fuchs konnten wir neue RV Techniken entwickeln. Die herkömmlichen RV Techniken kennen wir und setzten sie zum Teil auch ein. Wir haben nun jedoch Techniken entwickelt die auf jeden Fall eine Bereicherung zu den schon bestehenden Verfahren sind. Von unseren Resultaten überzeugt haben wir uns entschlossen Visionary Force, unser Remote Viewing Unternehmen zu gründen. Wir sind erst im Aufbau, aber wir sind sehr zuversichtlich.

Was ist aus dem smaragd-projekt geworden?
Leider hat sich der Kontakt mit dem damaligen Arbeitspartner verloren und das Projekt versandete. Auf jeden Fall dienten diese ersten Schritte als Grundstein für die Experimente die wir mit Visionary Force durchführten. Trotz Misserfolg also indirekt doch ein Erfolg da Iniziator für die ganzen Folgeprojekten.

Was genau ist remote viewing und woher kommt diese technik?
Bei der Fernwahrnehmung oder englisch 'Remote Viewing' geht es um das Erlangen von Informationen über einen Ort oder einen Vorgang (Ziel oder 'target'), von dem der Wahrnehmende (Perzipient) räumlich getrennt ist. Die Physiker Russell Targ und Harold Puthoff, die ersten, die über Remote Viewing forschten, erklärten 1977: Das grundsätzliche Phänomen überspannt eine Reihe von subjektiven Erfahrungen, in der Literatur beschrieben als Astralprojektion, einfaches Hellsehen, ›wanderndes‹ Hellsehen oder außerkörperliche Erfahrungen, Außerleiblichkeit (psychologisch) oder Autoskopie (medizinisch).

Während des Kalten Krieges lieferten sich Russen und Amerikaner nicht nur in Europa oder Südamerika einen erbitterten Krieg, sondern sogar in den feinstofflichen Dimensionen. In den 1970er Jahren hatten amerikanische Geheimdienste Hinweise darauf, dass die damalige UdSSR erstaunliche Resultate in der Parapsychologie erzielte. Das Wissen wurde von den Geheimdiensten zu Spionagezwecken eingesetzt.

Konsequent untersucht wurde die Fernwahrnehmung im Westen ab 1970 am Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park (Kalifornien). Dort starteten Versuche mit einem Team von sechs Medien. Daraus entwickelte sich das sogenannte Coordinate Remote Viewing, das zusammen mit den späteren Variationen heute generell als »Remote Viewing« bezeichnet wird. Von 1973 bis 1988 wurde in den USA in diesem Bereich viel experimentiert, und 1990 ging das Projekt zur Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) in Palo Alto (Kalifornien).

Das Projekt wurde von den amerikanischen Bundesbehörden wie der Armee, der Marine, der NASA und der CIA finanziell unterstützt. Die USA glaubten eine 'Psi-Lücke' (psychic gap) gegenüber der UdSSR festzustellen. Daher arbeitete diese Gruppe isoliert an militärischen Projekten. Sie versuchte unter anderem, Atomraketen, geheime Militärgelände und unterirdische Stationen in der UdSSR zu entdecken. Ende der 1970er Jahre sprang die Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) für die CIA ein und gab dem Projekt den Codenamen »Stargate«.

(Auszug aus Martin Zollers neuestem Buch 'Hellsichtig'. Im Verkauf ab März 2010 beim Giger Verlag.)

Reicht es mit remote viewing zu arbeiten, oder werden eure techniken am besten mit herkömmlichen strategie- und analysemethoden kombiniert?
Ich würde nicht sagen, dass es explizit besser ist RV mit herkömmlichen Techniken zu kombinieren. Sicher, eine Zusammenarbeit ist immer produktiv. Auf der anderen Seite haben die meisten herkömmlichen Methoden den Nachteil, dass sie strukturell und rationell funktionieren und somit oft unerwartete Ereignisse nicht erkennen können. Dies ist ganz eindeutig der Vorteil beim RV. Wir arbeiten rein intuitiv, das heisst wir analysieren Bilder und Visionen die wir zu einem bestimmten Thema erhalten. Diese sind unabhängig von vergangenen Erfahrungen oder Analysen.

Wie hoch ist die trefferquote der Visionary Force?
Je nach Arbeitsfeld zwischen 75 bis 100%

Wir haben aus deinem neuesten buch 'Hellsichtig' zitiert, welches ab März 2010 auf den markt kommt. Kannst du darüber schon was sagen?
In meinem neusten Buch schreibe ich über meine medialen Arbeiten in der Politik und Wirtschaft. In verschiedenen Ländern habe ich Politiker, Polizei, Firmen oder Staatssicherheitsdienste zur Seite gestanden. Medial habe ich verschiedenste Fälle analysiert und meinen Kunden praktisch immer erfolgreich weiterhelfen können. Es ist immer wieder schön zu sehen wie man Menschen helfen kann und in schwierigen Situationen wichtige Hinweise und Unterstützungen geben kann. Das Buch wird wie schon erwähnt ab Anfang März im Buchhandel erhältlich sein.

Wo können zusätzliche informationen über die Visionary Force gefunden werden?
Auf meiner Website Martinzoller.com - Visionary Force Remote Viewing. Auf dieser Seite wird unsere Arbeit genauer beschrieben. Natürlich kann man uns auch immer via Email kontaktieren. Bei Interesse senden wir auch gerne unsere RV-Präsentation mit detaillierter Aufstellung/Analyse von unseren Experimenten als PDF-Datei zu.

Beim foto oben handelt es sich um eines der remote viewing experimente der Visionary Force. Der schwarze kreis zeigt die stelle wo Martin Zoller mittels seinen RV-techniken intuitiv die position des versteckten ringes vermutet hat. Der rote kreis verweist auf die genaue stelle wo sich der gold-smaragdring tatsächlich befunden hat.

(c)reated by ultrafeel.tv - Veröffentlichung dieses interviews nur mit direktem link auf www.ultrafeel.tv/visionary-force-martin-zoller/

6 comments. What do you feel?